Solving a function or procedure with as little

harunur01999

In this phase, rushing does not contribute anything. Doing something in a hurry to meet a deadline is synonymous with higher costs since we will be generating technical debt without stopping, a debt that sooner or later we will pay. So it is always preferable to do quality programming, with the least technical debt and the fewest errors. Not in vain, the cost of resolving an error grows exponentially as the correction moves away from the moment of its initial development.


A good analystprogrammer, and at this point also a good programmer, must have two characteristics that make them better. The first is to be practical, that is, not to seek perfection , it is important to pamper the code to achie Senegal WhatsApp Number ve the best possible performance with code that is easy to understand and maintain. To give an example, it is logical to strive so that a form, instead of taking seconds to open, does so in tenths of a second.









Trying to lower that time from to tenths by complicating the programming does not make much sense except in exceptional cases. The second characteristic is to be simplistic, that is, apply the criterion of less is more. code as possible is a good sign, but it should not be our goal if by saving lines of code we make it difficult to understand and maintain. The most complicated thing is to develop simple applications, with the right options and the correct usability. What is left is as bad as what is missing .